World Cup Quiz

Started 20th April 2007 16:27 | by Tom Brown

Test your World Cup knowledge. No research allowed!

NameTime takenScore
Nik Baker08:106/8
Qais Hammad06:515/8
Owen Price01:384/8
Sam Burne James01:053/8
Tom Clare02:133/8
Rob Ivermee05:403/8
Luke Bailey01:182/8
Jack Hazzard01:402/8
Andy James01:441/8
Joe Huxley02:401/8
Matthew Martin03:421/8
David Robinson04:051/8
Craig Wheeler00:190/8
Alex Toogood00:490/8
Nicholas Ingram02:140/8

You must be logged in to enter the quiz.

14 Comments

22nd April 2007 18:22 | by Jack Hazzard

It is obvious that undue accuracy is needed on this quiz. And that Baker cheated...

22nd April 2007 20:22 | by Nik Baker

you would have got 4/8 hazzard if youd known (or approximated) their first names, but there is no need to resort to such slanderous accusations just because my knowledge of these questions was superior to your own. Still, at least you take solace from the fact you beat huxley (who answered one question 'that black guy')...

22nd April 2007 20:37 | by Jack Hazzard

It's the fact that you took over 8 minutes on a quiz which is meant to have no research which makes me suspicious Baker...

22nd April 2007 22:21 | by Tom Brown

Now only the quiz author can view statistics on the quiz... so Baker will not be able to spy on other people's answers unless he creates his own quiz. That should stop Huxley from further embarassment. Suffice to say that one of his answers to a question on the OUAFC quiz was "Joe Huxley" (I'll let you work out which question).

22nd April 2007 22:26 | by Tom Brown

A word on how the marking system works... the script compares your answer with the real answer and as long as they match by over about 80% you get the mark. It does the same with the way the two answers sound, and takes an overall average. I should have mentioned that I was looking for first names in this case. Anyway this quiz is just an example and won't count towards the overall OUAFC quiz championship...

22nd April 2007 22:48 | by Tom Brown

p.s. yes baker's 8 minutes is highly suspicious

22nd April 2007 23:39 | by Nik Baker

Just because i gave myself the time to mull over my answers (and remember all-important details such as first names) does not mean i cheated.

Had I cheated I would like to think that, firstly, I would have done it a lot quicker, and, secondly, would have got them all right...

23rd April 2007 09:22 | by Jack Hazzard

I think you would be a hell of an internet seach engine wizz to cheat at an average of faster than a minute a question (maybe Prico should get you a job on AQA.) We will have to take your word for it Baker...

23rd April 2007 09:24 | by Tom Brown

it's good to see that everyone who has entered so far has either finals or something important to hand in soon! (not sure about mm)

23rd April 2007 09:50 | by David Robinson

I'm still trying to work out how you set the quiz up and didn't get full marks Browny....

23rd April 2007 09:58 | by Tom Brown

I was just testing it and I couldn't be bothered to answer all the questions. It is a tough quiz though!

26th April 2007 17:40 | by Andy James

Happy with my attempt

26th April 2007 18:31 | by Jack Hazzard

An honest one is worth more in my book than anything which took over 4 minutes.

27th April 2007 11:54 | by Tom Brown

In retrospect this might have been a bit difficult.

Login


Forgotten your password?